- Optical Illusion Contest with a lot of interesting examples. Thanks to Stefan!
- Bloggy news of the week: The publish button under the comment preview works again!
- Most bizzare story of the week: Four Right Feet in Sneakers found on British Columbia's shoreline: Brutal crime or bizarre coincidences?
- Researcher confirm the reason for which I have a chocolate tray on my desk: Chocolate lowers aggressions. (You're supposed to eat it, not throw it on the wall.) Experience tells, nothing is as awful as a hungry man who tries to be reasonable.
- Blog post of the week: dx-smopuim
- Quotation of the week as a PS to The Block Universe:
"There is, I think, no theory-independent way to reconstruct phrases like 'really there'; the notion of a match between the ontology of a theory and its 'real' conterpart in nature now seems to me illusive in principle."~ T.S. Kuhn, in The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
Pages
▼
Monday, June 09, 2008
This and That
3 comments:
COMMENTS ON THIS BLOG ARE PERMANENTLY CLOSED. You can join the discussion on Patreon.
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.
Dear Bee,
ReplyDeleteah, I should replenish my stock of chocolate...
And maybe it would be great if it was possible to distribute virtual chocolates for blog commenters, to attenuate occasional aggressiveness ;-)
Cheers, Stefan
PS: Thanks for the hint about the publish button!
Dear Bee,
ReplyDeleteThis may be of interest -
http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2008/06/13/9590/
This is written in the context of a political campaign. But maybe it is useful in a scientific context as well. E.g., in the LHC produces a world-gobbling blackhole case.
Quote:
"Political Jujitsu, like the martial art, is a form of self-defense that is only effective when a person is forcibly attacked. Smears are intended as a weapon for character assassination, used by aggressors who prefer to remain hidden from view, which we could liken to the art of assassination, Ninjutsu.
This approach is founded upon the recognition that human beings organize our knowledge in the form of stories. Facts alone will not demonstrate the moral character of our candidate, just as they do not encapsulate the moral failures of our opponents. New information can transform the stories we tell, just as a new ingredient can transform a recipe. Adding turnips to a cake makes for a very different dining experience! Instead of simply seeking to “update” the facts, we must craft alternative stories that reveal the deception at work.
.....[example deleted]
This sample shifts the role of facts from asserting a falsehood in the original attack to revealing the existence of a deceiver in the response. The emphasis becomes one of questioning the sources of such messages to confirm their validity, instead of digressing into a “he said, she said” that only reinforces the false idea as it is repeated over and over."
Not sure yet how exactly to use it, but it seems to me that this insight may be useful.
The key point being "This sample shifts the role of facts from asserting a falsehood in the original attack to revealing the existence of a deceiver in the response."
ReplyDeleteSo far, e.g., in the evolution battle or the LHC/blackhole fuss, the scientist has been using facts to say "this is not true". If the idea is correct, it would be fruitful for the scientist to use the facts to expose the deceiver (creationist, anti-LHC luddite, etc.)