tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22973357.post7709083585263996343..comments2023-09-27T07:44:19.769-04:00Comments on Sabine Hossenfelder: Backreaction: This and ThatSabine Hossenfelderhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06151209308084588985noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22973357.post-13904552375367893552009-03-17T14:51:00.000-04:002009-03-17T14:51:00.000-04:00Oh, you are right. Must have been a tech bug. That...Oh, you are right. Must have been a tech bug. That's too bad, sorry about that.Sabine Hossenfelderhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06151209308084588985noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22973357.post-83185561742303388032009-03-17T14:49:00.000-04:002009-03-17T14:49:00.000-04:00It's not there, in the pi seminar archive. Tech No...It's not there, in the pi seminar archive. Tech Note: Not Recorded. Or am I completely missing something?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22973357.post-60991356876103797882009-03-11T12:16:00.000-04:002009-03-11T12:16:00.000-04:00Yes, I read it here. Sounds interesting.Yes, <A HREF="http://www.twine.com/item/122mz8lz9-4c/wolfram-alpha-is-coming-and-it-could-be-as-important-as-google" REL="nofollow">I read it here</A>. Sounds interesting.Sabine Hossenfelderhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06151209308084588985noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22973357.post-23040939434408485452009-03-10T23:20:00.000-04:002009-03-10T23:20:00.000-04:00Wolfram's answer to google?Information WeekWolfram's answer to google?<BR/><A HREF="http://www.informationweek.com/news/internet/search/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=215801388&pgno=1&queryText=&isPrev=" REL="nofollow">Information Week</A>Arunhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03451666670728177970noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22973357.post-66090184243693762652009-03-07T16:15:00.000-05:002009-03-07T16:15:00.000-05:00Dear Bee,This one page PDF purports to be the fas...Dear Bee,<BR/><BR/><A HREF="http://faculty.luther.edu/~macdonal/LorentzT.pdf" REL="nofollow">This one page PDF</A> purports to be the fastest derivation of Lorentz transformations.<BR/><BR/>Notice what is essential in this derivation is simply that different observers all agree on the motion of light rays. A metric would be derived after the Lorentz transformations are.<BR/><BR/>But this and Arunhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03451666670728177970noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22973357.post-10945431072312933972009-03-06T08:23:00.000-05:002009-03-06T08:23:00.000-05:00I am not employed by RIM.I am not employed by RIM.Sabine Hossenfelderhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06151209308084588985noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22973357.post-32010691729263508652009-03-06T08:21:00.000-05:002009-03-06T08:21:00.000-05:00Science Foo CampAugust 8-10, 2008Coincidentally, I...Science Foo Camp<BR/>August 8-10, 2008<BR/><BR/>Coincidentally, I ran into Rob Cook at SIGGRAPH 2008 (Aug 11-15) in Los Angeles, he's on the <A HREF="http://caltechscience.com/08siggraph/index.html#ack" REL="nofollow">left</A> (in the picture, above the picture of L. Riofrio). I went to do some networking for my idea of a "mobile scientist" (researchers can work from anywhere, using Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com