tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22973357.post115333102761428443..comments2023-09-27T07:44:19.769-04:00Comments on Sabine Hossenfelder: Backreaction: UPS Quantum ViewSabine Hossenfelderhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06151209308084588985noreply@blogger.comBlogger12125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22973357.post-16449214206795587692011-04-20T12:46:42.297-04:002011-04-20T12:46:42.297-04:00Can you direct me to a social studies blog about U...Can you direct me to a social studies blog about UPS?<br /><br />I've found their software refuses to integrate!<br /><br />Thank you,<br />Murphy's LawyerUnknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04258412976558057381noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22973357.post-1153886461396881172006-07-26T00:01:00.000-04:002006-07-26T00:01:00.000-04:00Should have stated that the Quantum "initial condi...Should have stated that the Quantum "initial condition", overlaps evolution process !<BR/><BR/>IE the "normal" state of events are intertwined in our Relative Universe, thus, PAST_PRESENT_FUTURE do not follow from observations ?<BR/><BR/>Electrons, as Feynman stated can never be detected in any "present" moments?<BR/><BR/>From this viewpoint, QF is needed to explain Electrons initial State, is itAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22973357.post-1153885777619368632006-07-25T23:49:00.000-04:002006-07-25T23:49:00.000-04:00Stefan, acccording to the data, you get confirmati...Stefan, acccording to the data, you get confirmation of delivery "before" sending letter !<BR/><BR/>Accordingly, letter tracked at:<BR/>13:57:06 (in transit)<BR/>arrived and signed :<BR/>12:32<BR/><BR/>Allowing for the grandmother paradox, I conclude the letter was signed not by "Sabine" but by a Relative ? ;)<BR/><BR/>Sending packages or "bundles" of information via all probable paths, Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22973357.post-1153855919114150762006-07-25T15:31:00.000-04:002006-07-25T15:31:00.000-04:00You can get mail from QuantumView ;-)From: "Quantu...You can get mail from QuantumView ;-)<BR/><BR/><I><BR/>From: "QuantumView" <QuantumViewNotify@ups.com><BR/>To: scherer@th.physik...<BR/>Subject: UPS Delivery Notification, Tracking Number 1Z...<BR/>Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 13:57:06 -0400 (EDT)<BR/><BR/>***Do not reply to this e-mail. UPS and MAIL BOXES ETC. will not receive your reply.<BR/><BR/>At the request of MAIL BOXES ETC., this notice stefanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09495628046446378453noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22973357.post-1153466615165976562006-07-21T03:23:00.000-04:002006-07-21T03:23:00.000-04:00Hilarious! I went through the whole links: Sell go...Hilarious! I went through the whole links: Sell goods in transit !<BR/><BR/>Maybe someone should inform UPS about "Quantum_Ranging" ?<BR/><BR/>Sending any goods from A to B has to be interaction free, sending goods via A is no guarantee of the goods existence, at B .<BR/><BR/>Discalimer?:<BR/>UPS takes no responsibility of goods if they do not arrive at B, if they have been in any way located in Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22973357.post-1153440724544515372006-07-20T20:12:00.000-04:002006-07-20T20:12:00.000-04:00Hi Quasar,indeed, I also thought Lubos post today ...Hi Quasar,<BR/><BR/>indeed, I also thought Lubos post today was quiet interesting - otherwise I probably wouldn't have read it. Anyway, concerning the sentece I commented on, I think Lubos was just sloppy with the formulation, or maybe careless. <BR/><BR/><I>so ST cannot be TOE as The Motl likes to claim</I><BR/><BR/>That depends on what you mean with a TOE. Let me first state that I don't think Sabine Hossenfelderhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06151209308084588985noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22973357.post-1153432344913035982006-07-20T17:52:00.000-04:002006-07-20T17:52:00.000-04:00In answer to your question nothing can be the answ...In answer to your question nothing can be the answer to everything, so ST cannot be TOE as The Motl likes to claim. It may give mathematical answers to the mathematical universe, but it cannot be the whole universe, nor the whole answer to the Universe.<BR/><BR/>However his post today made a rather good and interesting read, more so than some of his other rantsQUASAR9https://www.blogger.com/profile/00593390598251093182noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22973357.post-1153432058962770032006-07-20T17:47:00.000-04:002006-07-20T17:47:00.000-04:00This is not the same as saying the whole universe ...This is not the same as saying the whole universe could be string theory + appropriate initial conditions for this theory, as the initial conditions are not part of the theory itself. <BR/><BR/>Best, B.<BR/>Bee|Homepage|07.20.06-2:56 pm|#<BR/><BR/>Well he had to restate or fine tune the comment. It is not nit picking, it is being accurate. You two make a great debate challenge.<BR/><BR/>I look QUASAR9https://www.blogger.com/profile/00593390598251093182noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22973357.post-1153417900435466162006-07-20T13:51:00.000-04:002006-07-20T13:51:00.000-04:00Hi Quasar, I thought the point is clear. If you ha...Hi Quasar, <BR/><BR/>I thought the point is clear. If you have an evolution law, you still need initial conditions to describe the universe that we live in. That's a non-trivial point, essentially it goes back to the question how many - and which - parameters the theory minimally can have. E.g. do you think that string theory (should it be the TOE and actually be useful at some point) could ever Sabine Hossenfelderhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06151209308084588985noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22973357.post-1153415404269656602006-07-20T13:10:00.000-04:002006-07-20T13:10:00.000-04:00I will treat the "whole Universe" and "all of stri...<EM>I will treat the "whole Universe" and "all of string theory" as synonyma because I am not aware of any controllable framework that would allow me to separate them sharply.</EM> <BR/><STRONG>initial conditions.</STRONG><BR/>Bee |Homepage|07.20.06-12:04 pm| # <BR/><BR/>Are you gonna waste fingertips on keyboard trying to unravel Motl's arguments further, or build on the logic behind your QUASAR9https://www.blogger.com/profile/00593390598251093182noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22973357.post-1153404157782434862006-07-20T10:02:00.000-04:002006-07-20T10:02:00.000-04:00... if you send two packages in opposite direction...... if you send two packages in opposite directions and the first one gets squashed in handling, the second also collapses immediately.<BR/><BR/>... if you send a cat by UPS you won't know whether it is alive or dead until it gets unwrapped.<BR/><BR/>... if you have a narrow slit-shaped letterbox then the package will diffract through it.<BR/><BR/>Enough!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22973357.post-1153374674531645622006-07-20T01:51:00.000-04:002006-07-20T01:51:00.000-04:00You can out where it is, or where it is going, but...You can out where it is, or where it is going, but not both simultaneously.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com